Yep there's plenty of these half truth alternatives out there.
Tons of them are in the alt health movement.
Tons of them are in the alt war movement.
They say true things but then lack the ability to see the big picture where the Iran war makes no sense for example.
I agree that most of them are not intelligence agents but are influenced by intelligence seeded narratives. After all, confirmation bias can be used to influence those who question authority as much as those that blindly support it.
Funny timing, I just wrote a comment to an article about the concerns about the direction of the world and how voluntaryism is a solution.... I mention a lot of things that point out the push of narratives that are in effect a controlled demolition of the old parasites in order to usher in the "good guys"
"I get your concern about 4IR / 2030 as it scared me to no end especially during COVID.
However, it seems that it's a ploy to make people afraid of a boogeyman and that's why they had fascists like Klaus promote it and maniacs like Altman promote it.
That's why the WEF had a talk about loss of trust and said out loud that the solution is to have more censorship and authoritarian policies.
Imagine yourself the public relations of the WEF/etc. It would be smarter to say the nice things out loud but keep the authoritarian things private. But no, they say it out loud.
They even released event 201 right before COVID. I'm sure there were many other simulations in the past that were kept away from the public so why make that one accessible?
What I notice these days is that the old 1984 like plan of keeping the world segmented is no longer working as it hurts globocorps. If they're as intelligent as we think, they need to shift away from the old plan by making the old plan look insane.
Then they can come in and be the "good guys".
We see this with Trump, where his second term is full of craziness which breaks the "America is great" illusion that persisted during Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump 1st term.
Biden was also craziness where they allowed him to walk around lost on stage a couple of times without anyone on his team to guide him off stage. This is not by accident and neither are Trump's insane statements.
The president is a puppet and there are ways to get him to say the right things as we have seen throughout history.
So why let Trump and Biden do crazy things?
Same reason why COVID happened the way it did.
If they wanted to trick everyone into compliance, they would have made the first rounds of the shots safe to build confidence. Then later on they could release harmful shots. Heck, they didn't even need to make them harmful directly. Pharma made shots that secretly made people sterile in Africa.
So why the clot shots? Knowing that it was a department of defense operation as they handled vaccine manufacturing since 911 bioterror Anthrax hype, perhaps it was done to make pharma look like the bad guys.
That's why you don't see alt health people like Pierre Kory and the MAHA movement bring this dod thing up. Instead they blame pharma because that's the narrative they want us to believe.
It's a controlled demolition of pharma and Gaza and Iran are a controlled demolition of Israel's influence.
We also are seeing the financial system and big oil getting tarred and feathered for speculation profiteering these days.
Mind you that gas was MORE EXPENSIVE adjusted for inflation during Bush's Iraq war than it is today.... Hmmm"
Exactly. Half-truths are more dangerous than outright lies because they give you just enough reality to trust the rest.
The alt health and alt war movements are full of this – true patterns applied to the wrong conclusions. That's the attentional capture trick: get you to question the right things, then steer you toward the wrong answers.
And you're spot on about confirmation bias cutting both ways. Questioning authority doesn't make you immune – it just changes which hooks you bite on.
I wonder if you are familiar with Isaac Asimov's Foundation series (originally a trilogy). It's science fiction. It's concerned with the fall and rise of a galactic empire, where the course of history is manipulated by psychological warfare operatives (the Second Foundation). One of their tenets is:
"The closer to the truth, the better the lie, and the truth itself, when it can be used, is the best lie."
A good article, with pros and cons. I follow your logic that it's good to be open to logic, but if it talks like a snake and acts like a snake, it probably is a snake. The serpent was known as the shrewdest of all the wild animals God created. A good illustration of confirmation bias Genesis 3:1-4, the serpent playing mind games with Eve with one question and few sentences, an act of persuasion which affected a whole civilization. I agree with a book and video study by Lou Giglio, "Don't Give The Enemy A Seat At Your Table."
Thank you so much! You're right: if it talks like a snake and acts like a snake, it probably is a snake. But if Eve hadn't listened to the serpent and hadn't eaten that fruit, we wouldn't have a civilization today. That's another story though. Eve didn't think she was being deceived; she thought she was having a genuine conversation. And she actually was… bittersweet decision she made, literally.
Lou Giglio's point about not giving the enemy a seat at your table is powerful. But the serpent doesn't ask for a seat. He whispers while you're already eating – from a friend, or a fellow churchgoer. He even whispers in your own voice. That's why I lean toward engagement with discernment rather than outright dismissal – because if you never listen, you won't recognize the voice when it matters. But if you listen without a filter, you're already lost.
So I appreciate the balance you're striking. The snake is shrewd. We need to be shrewder – not by shutting our ears, but by learning to hear the hiss beneath the charm.
You offer a lot of valid points. I also appreciate the thoughts and direction you are taking. Look forward to some future discussion. Very Interesting and curious to hear why Eve couldn't start a civilization without eating of the fruit.
Referring to the enemy being invited to the table or already there, I can see why you lean toward engagement with discernment. However, I would caution a person to be spiritually equipped and knowledgeable before discerning those whispers. One needs to be able to discern a very fine line between what is truth and what is a lie.
Jesus was taken by the spirit into the wilderness. Obviously, with God's consent to tempt Jesus. He used God's word to do so. Jesus, being fully God, in human form, followed the same command God gave to Adam and Eve, which they did not do, to "Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky and all the animals that scurry along the ground." Genesis 1:28b (NLT).
Wendy, excellent analytics with this piece. I worked along side much of this and the shaping you describe is so spot on. Certainly on a much smaller scale but demonstrative, mid way through my career I found myself with every PowerPoint briefing I was taking as part of an audience was searching for the critical data that the briefers (magicians) felt was irrelevant and was absent. Many times I found they deemed the data as inessential to the argument or contrary to their paper. Wendy, thank you again. What this highlights and reinforces for me is be a critical thinker, remain objective, do the research and synthesize the data and form your opinion lest we be controlled !
Thank you for this – seriously. "Searching for the critical data that the briefers deemed irrelevant" – that's the whole game, isn't it? The magician doesn't hide the deck; he just makes sure you're looking somewhere else. And when the missing data would contradict the narrative, it's not an accident. It's steering.
What you lived in those meetings is what I tried to describe on a larger scale. Whether it's a corporate briefing or a YouTube prophet, the mechanism is the same: control what information reaches your attention, and you control the conclusion.
And you're right about the only way out – be a critical thinker, stay objective, do the research, synthesize the data yourself. Otherwise, someone else will do it for you. And they're not doing it for your benefit.
Thanks again for reading and for sharing your experience.
Yep there's plenty of these half truth alternatives out there.
Tons of them are in the alt health movement.
Tons of them are in the alt war movement.
They say true things but then lack the ability to see the big picture where the Iran war makes no sense for example.
I agree that most of them are not intelligence agents but are influenced by intelligence seeded narratives. After all, confirmation bias can be used to influence those who question authority as much as those that blindly support it.
Funny timing, I just wrote a comment to an article about the concerns about the direction of the world and how voluntaryism is a solution.... I mention a lot of things that point out the push of narratives that are in effect a controlled demolition of the old parasites in order to usher in the "good guys"
https://substack.com/@robc137/note/c-272121413
"I get your concern about 4IR / 2030 as it scared me to no end especially during COVID.
However, it seems that it's a ploy to make people afraid of a boogeyman and that's why they had fascists like Klaus promote it and maniacs like Altman promote it.
That's why the WEF had a talk about loss of trust and said out loud that the solution is to have more censorship and authoritarian policies.
Imagine yourself the public relations of the WEF/etc. It would be smarter to say the nice things out loud but keep the authoritarian things private. But no, they say it out loud.
They even released event 201 right before COVID. I'm sure there were many other simulations in the past that were kept away from the public so why make that one accessible?
What I notice these days is that the old 1984 like plan of keeping the world segmented is no longer working as it hurts globocorps. If they're as intelligent as we think, they need to shift away from the old plan by making the old plan look insane.
Then they can come in and be the "good guys".
We see this with Trump, where his second term is full of craziness which breaks the "America is great" illusion that persisted during Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump 1st term.
Biden was also craziness where they allowed him to walk around lost on stage a couple of times without anyone on his team to guide him off stage. This is not by accident and neither are Trump's insane statements.
The president is a puppet and there are ways to get him to say the right things as we have seen throughout history.
So why let Trump and Biden do crazy things?
Same reason why COVID happened the way it did.
If they wanted to trick everyone into compliance, they would have made the first rounds of the shots safe to build confidence. Then later on they could release harmful shots. Heck, they didn't even need to make them harmful directly. Pharma made shots that secretly made people sterile in Africa.
So why the clot shots? Knowing that it was a department of defense operation as they handled vaccine manufacturing since 911 bioterror Anthrax hype, perhaps it was done to make pharma look like the bad guys.
That's why you don't see alt health people like Pierre Kory and the MAHA movement bring this dod thing up. Instead they blame pharma because that's the narrative they want us to believe.
It's a controlled demolition of pharma and Gaza and Iran are a controlled demolition of Israel's influence.
We also are seeing the financial system and big oil getting tarred and feathered for speculation profiteering these days.
Mind you that gas was MORE EXPENSIVE adjusted for inflation during Bush's Iraq war than it is today.... Hmmm"
Exactly. Half-truths are more dangerous than outright lies because they give you just enough reality to trust the rest.
The alt health and alt war movements are full of this – true patterns applied to the wrong conclusions. That's the attentional capture trick: get you to question the right things, then steer you toward the wrong answers.
And you're spot on about confirmation bias cutting both ways. Questioning authority doesn't make you immune – it just changes which hooks you bite on.
I wonder if you are familiar with Isaac Asimov's Foundation series (originally a trilogy). It's science fiction. It's concerned with the fall and rise of a galactic empire, where the course of history is manipulated by psychological warfare operatives (the Second Foundation). One of their tenets is:
"The closer to the truth, the better the lie, and the truth itself, when it can be used, is the best lie."
No I am not familiar with that series but it sounds good (and right). I’ll check it out.
A good article, with pros and cons. I follow your logic that it's good to be open to logic, but if it talks like a snake and acts like a snake, it probably is a snake. The serpent was known as the shrewdest of all the wild animals God created. A good illustration of confirmation bias Genesis 3:1-4, the serpent playing mind games with Eve with one question and few sentences, an act of persuasion which affected a whole civilization. I agree with a book and video study by Lou Giglio, "Don't Give The Enemy A Seat At Your Table."
Thank you so much! You're right: if it talks like a snake and acts like a snake, it probably is a snake. But if Eve hadn't listened to the serpent and hadn't eaten that fruit, we wouldn't have a civilization today. That's another story though. Eve didn't think she was being deceived; she thought she was having a genuine conversation. And she actually was… bittersweet decision she made, literally.
Lou Giglio's point about not giving the enemy a seat at your table is powerful. But the serpent doesn't ask for a seat. He whispers while you're already eating – from a friend, or a fellow churchgoer. He even whispers in your own voice. That's why I lean toward engagement with discernment rather than outright dismissal – because if you never listen, you won't recognize the voice when it matters. But if you listen without a filter, you're already lost.
So I appreciate the balance you're striking. The snake is shrewd. We need to be shrewder – not by shutting our ears, but by learning to hear the hiss beneath the charm.
Thanks again for reading so closely.
You offer a lot of valid points. I also appreciate the thoughts and direction you are taking. Look forward to some future discussion. Very Interesting and curious to hear why Eve couldn't start a civilization without eating of the fruit.
Referring to the enemy being invited to the table or already there, I can see why you lean toward engagement with discernment. However, I would caution a person to be spiritually equipped and knowledgeable before discerning those whispers. One needs to be able to discern a very fine line between what is truth and what is a lie.
Jesus was taken by the spirit into the wilderness. Obviously, with God's consent to tempt Jesus. He used God's word to do so. Jesus, being fully God, in human form, followed the same command God gave to Adam and Eve, which they did not do, to "Reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky and all the animals that scurry along the ground." Genesis 1:28b (NLT).
Wendy, excellent analytics with this piece. I worked along side much of this and the shaping you describe is so spot on. Certainly on a much smaller scale but demonstrative, mid way through my career I found myself with every PowerPoint briefing I was taking as part of an audience was searching for the critical data that the briefers (magicians) felt was irrelevant and was absent. Many times I found they deemed the data as inessential to the argument or contrary to their paper. Wendy, thank you again. What this highlights and reinforces for me is be a critical thinker, remain objective, do the research and synthesize the data and form your opinion lest we be controlled !
Thank you for this – seriously. "Searching for the critical data that the briefers deemed irrelevant" – that's the whole game, isn't it? The magician doesn't hide the deck; he just makes sure you're looking somewhere else. And when the missing data would contradict the narrative, it's not an accident. It's steering.
What you lived in those meetings is what I tried to describe on a larger scale. Whether it's a corporate briefing or a YouTube prophet, the mechanism is the same: control what information reaches your attention, and you control the conclusion.
And you're right about the only way out – be a critical thinker, stay objective, do the research, synthesize the data yourself. Otherwise, someone else will do it for you. And they're not doing it for your benefit.
Thanks again for reading and for sharing your experience.
Great article, enjoyed reading this, especially the conclusion, Learning the Hard Way: A Path Forward.
Thank you so much! That's my favorite part too. ;)